NFL Best & Worst Trends — 2026
Completed-game data through 2026-10-26
Best ATS
| Rank | Team | Record W–L / O–U | Win / Over % | Graded | Pushes | Missing lines | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicago Bears | 5-2 | 71.4% | 7 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 2 | Cleveland Browns | 5-2 | 71.4% | 7 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 3 | Denver Broncos | 5-2 | 71.4% | 7 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 4 | Las Vegas Raiders | 5-2 | 71.4% | 7 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 5 | New York Giants | 5-2 | 71.4% | 7 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 6 | Pittsburgh Steelers | 5-2 | 71.4% | 7 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 7 | Buffalo Bills | 4-2 | 66.7% | 6 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 8 | Minnesota Vikings | 4-2 | 66.7% | 6 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
Worst ATS
| Rank | Team | Record W–L / O–U | Win / Over % | Graded | Pushes | Missing lines | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Los Angeles Chargers | 0-5-1 | 0.0% | 5 | 1 | 0 | Low sample |
| 2 | Detroit Lions | 1-4-1 | 20.0% | 5 | 1 | 0 | Low sample |
| 3 | Houston Texans | 2-5 | 28.6% | 7 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 4 | Los Angeles Rams | 2-5 | 28.6% | 7 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 5 | Philadelphia Eagles | 2-5 | 28.6% | 7 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 6 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 2-5 | 28.6% | 7 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 7 | Baltimore Ravens | 2-4-1 | 33.3% | 6 | 1 | 0 | Low sample |
| 8 | Seattle Seahawks | 2-3-2 | 40.0% | 5 | 2 | 0 | Low sample |
Highest Over Rates
| Rank | Team | Record W–L / O–U | Win / Over % | Graded | Pushes | Missing lines | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Buffalo Bills | 5-1 | 83.3% | 6 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 2 | Detroit Lions | 5-1 | 83.3% | 6 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 3 | Baltimore Ravens | 5-2 | 71.4% | 7 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 4 | Dallas Cowboys | 5-2 | 71.4% | 7 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 5 | Las Vegas Raiders | 5-2 | 71.4% | 7 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 6 | New York Giants | 5-2 | 71.4% | 7 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 7 | Cincinnati Bengals | 4-2 | 66.7% | 6 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 8 | Washington Commanders | 4-2 | 66.7% | 6 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
Highest Under Rates
| Rank | Team | Record W–L / O–U | Win / Over % | Graded | Pushes | Missing lines | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Los Angeles Chargers | 1-5 | 16.7% | 6 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 2 | Minnesota Vikings | 1-5 | 16.7% | 6 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 3 | Denver Broncos | 2-5 | 28.6% | 7 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 4 | Green Bay Packers | 2-5 | 28.6% | 7 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 5 | Jacksonville Jaguars | 2-4 | 33.3% | 6 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 6 | Kansas City Chiefs | 2-4 | 33.3% | 6 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 7 | Chicago Bears | 3-4 | 42.9% | 7 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
| 8 | New York Jets | 3-4 | 42.9% | 7 | 0 | 0 | Low sample |
All Team Records and Scoring
| Team | GP | SU | ATS | ATS % | O–U | Over % | Points/G | Allowed/G | Diff/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona Cardinals | 7 | 2-5 | 3-4 | 42.9% | 4-3 | 57.1% | 20.3 | 29.7 | -9.4 |
| Atlanta Falcons | 7 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 42.9% | 4-3 | 57.1% | 24.4 | 24.7 | -0.3 |
| Baltimore Ravens | 7 | 4-3 | 2-4-1 | 33.3% | 5-2 | 71.4% | 24.1 | 23.9 | +0.3 |
| Buffalo Bills | 6 | 5-1 | 4-2 | 66.7% | 5-1 | 83.3% | 32.8 | 28.5 | +4.3 |
| Carolina Panthers | 6 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 50.0% | 3-3 | 50.0% | 26.5 | 27.7 | -1.2 |
| Chicago Bears | 7 | 5-2 | 5-2 | 71.4% | 3-4 | 42.9% | 25.7 | 20.4 | +5.3 |
| Cincinnati Bengals | 6 | 4-2 | 3-3 | 50.0% | 4-2 | 66.7% | 27.2 | 20.3 | +6.8 |
| Cleveland Browns | 7 | 5-2 | 5-2 | 71.4% | 4-3 | 57.1% | 19.0 | 20.9 | -1.9 |
| Dallas Cowboys | 7 | 3-4 | 3-3-1 | 50.0% | 5-2 | 71.4% | 27.0 | 25.7 | +1.3 |
| Denver Broncos | 7 | 5-2 | 5-2 | 71.4% | 2-5 | 28.6% | 20.6 | 20.1 | +0.4 |
| Detroit Lions | 6 | 4-2 | 1-4-1 | 20.0% | 5-1 | 83.3% | 30.7 | 27.5 | +3.2 |
| Green Bay Packers | 7 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 57.1% | 2-5 | 28.6% | 20.6 | 20.7 | -0.1 |
| Houston Texans | 7 | 2-5 | 2-5 | 28.6% | 4-3 | 57.1% | 23.6 | 24.3 | -0.7 |
| Indianapolis Colts | 7 | 2-5 | 4-3 | 57.1% | 4-3 | 57.1% | 22.0 | 25.7 | -3.7 |
| Jacksonville Jaguars | 6 | 4-2 | 3-3 | 50.0% | 2-4 | 33.3% | 25.7 | 17.3 | +8.3 |
| Kansas City Chiefs | 6 | 5-1 | 3-3 | 50.0% | 2-4 | 33.3% | 23.8 | 17.2 | +6.7 |
| Las Vegas Raiders | 7 | 3-4 | 5-2 | 71.4% | 5-2 | 71.4% | 26.1 | 28.1 | -2.0 |
| Los Angeles Chargers | 6 | 0-6 | 0-5-1 | 0.0% | 1-5 | 16.7% | 15.0 | 25.2 | -10.2 |
| Los Angeles Rams | 7 | 3-4 | 2-5 | 28.6% | 4-3 | 57.1% | 24.3 | 22.7 | +1.6 |
| Miami Dolphins | 6 | 1-5 | 3-3 | 50.0% | 3-3 | 50.0% | 16.3 | 26.2 | -9.8 |
| Minnesota Vikings | 6 | 6-0 | 4-2 | 66.7% | 1-5 | 16.7% | 20.8 | 12.3 | +8.5 |
| New England Patriots | 7 | 4-3 | 3-3-1 | 50.0% | 4-3 | 57.1% | 22.9 | 20.4 | +2.4 |
| New Orleans Saints | 7 | 2-5 | 3-4 | 42.9% | 4-3 | 57.1% | 23.1 | 27.7 | -4.6 |
| New York Giants | 7 | 4-2-1 | 5-2 | 71.4% | 5-2 | 71.4% | 23.3 | 23.0 | +0.3 |
| New York Jets | 7 | 2-5 | 4-2-1 | 66.7% | 3-4 | 42.9% | 19.6 | 21.4 | -1.9 |
| Philadelphia Eagles | 7 | 2-5 | 2-5 | 28.6% | 4-3 | 57.1% | 18.1 | 25.0 | -6.9 |
| Pittsburgh Steelers | 7 | 5-2 | 5-2 | 71.4% | 4-3 | 57.1% | 21.9 | 19.7 | +2.1 |
| San Francisco 49ers | 7 | 6-1 | 4-3 | 57.1% | 3-4 | 42.9% | 28.1 | 19.9 | +8.3 |
| Seattle Seahawks | 7 | 4-3 | 2-3-2 | 40.0% | 3-4 | 42.9% | 24.0 | 17.9 | +6.1 |
| Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 7 | 2-5 | 2-5 | 28.6% | 4-3 | 57.1% | 23.1 | 21.6 | +1.6 |
| Tennessee Titans | 7 | 1-6 | 3-4 | 42.9% | 4-3 | 57.1% | 15.4 | 22.3 | -6.9 |
| Washington Commanders | 6 | 1-4-1 | 3-3 | 50.0% | 4-2 | 66.7% | 22.0 | 28.7 | -6.7 |
Closing lines only. Missing closing lines are excluded; opening lines are not substituted. Pushes are shown separately and excluded from percentages. Early-season rankings may have fewer than 10 graded games and stay neutral.
Continue the Research
Move from the market to the matchup and back again. Use each report as a cross-check, not a conclusion by itself.
Line HistoryFollow opening numbers and sportsbook movement.Matchup ReportsCompare the teams before interpreting the market.Team TrendsReview ATS, totals and situational performance.All ReportsOpen the complete research library.NFL MURCompare core matchup categories and team data.Best/Worst TrendsFind qualifying green and red NFL situations.